PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS against a Public Official:
Question: Did the public official commit a “crime”?
Answer: An elected official has a duty called “due diligence”.
If they don’t do it, you REMOVE them. IMMEDIATELY.
Ask a lawyer…
Four Legal Terms to know for Private Prosecutions:
1. DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE: (reckless indifference or conscious avoidance)
Did the Official:
(a) choose to remain ignorant despite being told of harm,
(b) disregard risk of harmful actions, &/or
(c) disregard the harm their actions cause/d.
2. WILLFUL BLINDNESS:
Did the Official:
(a) deliberately avoid knowledge of a crime,
(b) fail to investigate when asked, &/or
(c) refuse to investigate because they already know.
For example, refusing to look inside an unmarked package after being paid by a known drug dealer to deliver it.
3. RELIANCE:
Was there:
(a) a dependency or TRUST created with the elected Official,
(b) a duty to do what benefits the TRUST, and
(c) a reliance on them not to breach or cause detriment.
4. DETRIMENTAL RELIANCE:
Did you:
(a) rely on the Official to act in your best interest,
(b) believe their elected “promise” was as enforceable as a “contract”. (*promissory estoppel), and
(c) experience harm by their actions.
*NOTE: “RELIANCE” serves as a substitute for “consideration” in contract law.
Fraud Vitiates All…
Step Up, Step Down or Step Aside.
Lead, Follow or Get out of the Way.
I want to have Bob Hamilton of the CRA charged criminally for the damage he has done to people. See the Irwin LeRoux case as a prime example. These people are not above the law. People are afraid to fight back because of retaliation. CRA can take everything you own and be in the wrong and there is nothing anyone can do about it. Lawyers will not touch CRA.